Residential Treatment Services (CA-RTX) 17: Privacy Provisions
The organization provides for resident comfort, dignity, privacy, and safety.
Currently viewing: RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT SERVICES (CA-RTX)
Viewing: CA-RTX 17 - Privacy Provisions
VIEW THE STANDARDS
PurposeResidential Treatment Services provide individualized therapeutic interventions and a range of services, including education for residents to increase productive and pro-social behaviour, improve functioning and well-being, and return to a stable living arrangement in the community.
All elements or requirements outlined in the standard are evident in practice, as indicated by full implementation of the practices outlined in the Practice Standards.
Practices are basically sound but there is room for improvement, as noted in the ratings for the Practice Standards; e.g.,
- Minor inconsistencies and not yet fully developed practices are noted; however, these do not significantly impact service quality; or
- Procedures need strengthening; or
- With few exceptions, procedures are understood by staff and are being used; or
- For the most part, established timeframes are met; or
- Proper documentation is the norm and any issues with individual staff members are being addressed through performance evaluations and training; or
- Active client participation occurs to a considerable extent.
Practice requires significant improvement, as noted in the ratings for the Practice Standards. Service quality or program functioning may be compromised; e.g.,
- Procedures and/or case record documentation need significant strengthening; or
- Procedures are not well-understood or used appropriately; or
- Timeframes are often missed; or
- Several client records are missing important information; or
- Client participation is inconsistent.
Implementation of the standard is minimal or there is no evidence of implementation at all, as noted in the ratings for the Practice Standards; e.g.,
- No written procedures, or procedures are clearly inadequate or not being used; or
- Documentation is routinely incomplete and/or missing.
|Self-Study Evidence||On-Site Evidence||On-Site Activities|
The organization ensures residents’ comfort, dignity, privacy, and safety by:
- prohibiting the use of surveillance cameras or listening devices in bedrooms;
- maintaining doors on sleeping areas and bathroom enclosures;
- providing one- or two-person rooms to residents who need extra sleep, protection from sleep disturbance, or extra privacy for clinical reasons; and
- requiring employees to knock before entering a resident’s room unless there is an immediate health or safety concern.
InterpretationWhen organizations are required to employ alternate practices, documentation must be provided to justify the practice. Documentation may include a judicial order, law, regulations, and/or contracts, copy of a safety plan for a resident, or clear, clinical written justification for a resident.
Sensitivity should always be taken to ensure that all service recipients, especially abuse or trauma survivors and the LGBTQ population, feel safe and not violated.
Searches of residents or their property are conducted in a trauma-informed manner that respects client rights, dignity, and self-determination and include, as appropriate to the frequency and invasiveness of searches:
- communicating to service recipients policies for searches of individuals or their property;
- timely notification of a parent and/or legal guardian;
- definition and documentation of reasonable cause and assessed risk of harm to self or others;
- trained, qualified staff; and
- an administrative review process including documentation, notification, and a timetable for review.
InterpretationSearch procedures should correspond directly to the invasiveness of the search to be conducted. For example, more invasive searches should be reserved for higher risk situations with reasonable cause, should only be conducted by highly qualified personnel, and always require an administrative review.
The organization communicates policies that respect residents’ privacy for reviewing mail and only does so when a previous incident involving the resident indicates that:
- the mail is suspected of containing unauthorized, dangerous, or illegal material or substances, in which case it may be opened by the resident in the presence of designated personnel; or
- receipt or sending of unopened mail is contraindicated.
InterpretationPrograms serving individuals with substance use conditions may require personnel to review mail without incident due to the reason for which residents are seeking treatment. If an organization employs this approach, they must provide justification for taking such measures, which may include health, safety, and other security concerns.
Examples: Examples of mail include letters, packages, emails, and other forms of correspondence via social media and electronic communication.
Residents can have private telephone conversations, and any restriction is:
- based on contraindications and/or a court order;
- approved in advance by the program director or an appropriate designee;
- documented in the case record; and
- reauthorized weekly by the immediate supervisor of the direct service provider.