President Donald Trump signed an executive order, Lowering Drug Prices By Once Again Putting Americans First, directing the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to reduce prescription drug cost of and expand access. Key provisions include:

Mehmet Oz Confirmed as CMS Administrator

The Senate confirmed Dr. Mehmet Oz as the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in a 53-45 vote. Oz emphasized priorities including health care cost transparency, expedited access to life saving treatments, and combating fraud and waste. He also expressed a commitment to prevention, wellness, and chronic disease management.

HHS Says Gender Dysphoria Not Enforceable Under Disability Protections

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) clarified that gender dysphoria is not enforceable under federal disability protections outlined in its rule Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance. The department stated that the language appeared in the preamble – not the regulatory text – and therefore does not carry the force of the law.

Congress Advances Budget Framework

The House and Senate passed a budget framework along partisan lines, completing the first step of budget reconciliation. The plan includes:

These increases have raised bipartisan concerns over the federal deficit and potential cuts to health and nutrition programs. The final budget is expected to extend provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, with a House vote anticipated by the end of May.

CMS Proposes Rule for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule updating Medicare payment policies for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities (IPF) for fiscal year 2026. Highlights include:

CMS also proposed removing four quality reporting measures starting in CY 2024/FY 2026:

If finalized, the rule would take effect Oct. 1, 2025.

CMS Limits Future Section 1115 Waivers

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced it will no longer approve or renew Section 1115 demonstration waivers for programs previously funded without Medicare dollars. These include initiatives using Designated State Health Programs or Investment Programs. CMS cited redundancy with other federal and state efforts.

Section 1115 waivers have traditionally allowed states to expand Medicaid services and address social determinants, including housing, nutrition, and workforce development.

House Panel Reviews TANF Oversight Following a GAO Report

The House Subcommittee on Work and Welfare held a hearing following the release of a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report recommending stronger oversight of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Key findings include a shift in state spending from direct cash assistance to services, including job training and child welfare. GAO advised enhanced data reporting, improved assessing fraud risk assessments, and better tracking of audit resolutions.

Roxane Somerlot, director of the Marion County Department of Job and Family Services, testified on the value of TANF-funded services, highlighting child care, youth employment programs, and supports for families nearing income thresholds that affect benefit eligibility.

SNAP Employment Programs Highlighted in House Agriculture Hearing

The House Committee on Agriculture explored strategies to increase employment among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants.

Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-Pa.) emphasized the importance of work requirements and SNAP Employment and Training (E&T) programs. Witnesses shared personal success stories, though studies show mixed results on work requirement effectiveness for able-bodied adults without dependents.

Recommendations included ensuring consistent implementation of work requirements and supporting the Training and Nutrition Stability Act, which would exempt temporary training income from benefit eligibility calculations.

Updates from the Judiciary 

Supreme Court Upholds Pause on Teacher Training Grants

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling that would have required the Trump administration to temporarily reinstate $250 million in teacher training grants across eight states.

The grants were terminated because they supported programs that included equity, diversity,  and inclusion (EDI) components. The justices ruled that the pause would cause permanent harm to the states while litigation proceeds and noted that once disbursed, the federal government would likely be unable to recover the funds.

Four justices dissented, arguing the administration failed to justify the cancellations and that the case did not warrant emergency review. They also raised concerns about the impact on teacher shortages and long-term harm to the public education systems in the affected states.

Supreme Court Backs Federal Regulation of Ghost Guns

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the Biden Administration’s regulation of ghost guns, untraceable firearms assembled from kits or parts often purchased online. These weapons lack serial numbers, making them difficult to trace and increasingly appealing to individuals barred from owning firearms, including minors, domestic abusers, and gun traffickers.

The rule, based on the Gun Control Act of 1968, redefines “frame and receiver” to bring ghost guns under federal oversight. Challengers argued the rule could apply to any ghost guns, but the Court affirmed that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has authority to regulate such parts kits.

The ruling keeps the regulation in effect but allows for further legal challenges regarding how it applies to specific cases.

Subscribe to the Policy and Advocacy Radar to receive our biweekly policy roundup, which includes commentary on issues in Social Current’s federal policy agenda, opportunities to take action, and curated news and opportunities.

“There’s always an opportunity to become a better advocate,” said Jonathan Vasquez, government relations and advocacy assistant at Children’s Institute in Los Angeles. “That’s what the families and communities we serve at the Children’s Institute deserve—people who have the expertise and knowledge to be effective champions of the work.”

Using a whole-family approach, Children’s Institute helps children and families discover strengths and develop skills that create enduring success. For over 20 years, its Project Fatherhood program has provided parenting support to 15,000 men in caregiver roles in Los Angeles.

“After hearing directly from those we serve how often they felt disregarded, forgotten, and disposable, there was a desire to center the emotional and behavioral well-being of fathers in our work,” said Vasquez. “Centering community and lived experience in policy solutions ensures the dreams and aspirations of the communities we serve are reflected.”

After hearing the input of fathers and participating in several advocacy trainings hosted by Social Current, Children’s Institute recognized a need to advocate within all levels of government to bolster and expand this work.

Engaging over 100 fathers, community partners, and government agencies, Children’s Institute held a series of listening sessions that allowed LA County representatives to hear directly from fathers impacted by systemic inequity. These sessions resulted in 27 recommendations advanced by the county in areas including child services, mental health, economic support, and the justice system.

Children’s Institute’s Government Relations & Advocacy and Project Fatherhood teams cultivated a network of elected officials to champion father well-being and amplify a new narrative about fathers. The effort declared June “Fatherhood Well-Being Month” each year in the state of California through House Resolution 36.

With several federally funded initiatives—including Project Fatherhood—Children’s Institute seeks to expand its advocacy efforts at the federal level. Recently, the Government Relations & Advocacy team attended Social Current’s 2024 Advocacy Amplified Training and Hill Day, where they were able to advocate for Head Start funding to further propel their programs forward. Social Current staff also reviewed and provided feedback on their public policy and advocacy agenda to ensure greater impact.

“We are so thankful for our partnership with Social Current,” said Terry Kim, director of government relations and advocacy at Children’s Institute. “They facilitate opportunities to connect with organizations across the country, enhancing our impact and supporting our growth to be stronger advocates for our communities.”

Connect Local Voices to National Advocacy: Join Us in Washington, D.C.

Join Social Current for the Advocacy Amplified Training and Hill Day, taking place June 16–18 in Washington, D.C. This dynamic two-day training and advocacy day on Capitol Hill will equip you with the tools, strategies, and confidence to be a powerful advocate for your organization and community.

Whether you’re new to advocacy or looking to sharpen your approach, this is your opportunity to learn alongside peers, engage directly with lawmakers on Capitol Hill, and make your voice heard.

Social Current also offers customizable solutions to help organizations expand their advocacy efforts and increase their impact–from advocacy and government relations advising, strategy development, and more.

Social Current’s Knowledge and Insights Center recently released an overview of assessing and managing risk for community-based human and social services organizations. Unexpected events, such as disasters, economic downturns, or sudden shifts in public policy, can often cause greater harm to these organizations because they often operate with limited resources, rely heavily on volunteers, and are sustained through government and philanthropic funding.

It is imperative that organizations are proactive and conduct regular risk assessment and mitigation planning to identify financial and operational vulnerabilities and develop plans that can be implemented quickly if adverse situations occur.

Effective risk management is also pivotal to maintaining stability and growth in uncertain times. It encompasses a systematic approach to identifying potential threats and opportunities, evaluating their likelihood and impact, and implementing strategies to moderate adverse effects while maximizing positive outcomes. This spotlight covers:

Download the spotlight on assessing and managing risk online.

Social Current’s Knowledge and Insights Center provides human and social services organizations with the research and information they need to stay current and make informed decisions. In addition to a clearinghouse library, it offers resource collections on key topics, access to specialized databases, and research support from skilled librarians. To gain access, organizations can become a Social Current Impact Partner or purchase access. Contact us to learn more.

Additional Risk Management Resources

On March 27, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a significant restructuring aligned with President Trump’s executive order on government efficiency and workforce optimization.

The plan reduces HHS regional offices from 10 to five and eliminates an additional 10,000 positions, following previous downsizing efforts. In addition to HHS staff reductions, the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) has announced the immediate closure of five regional offices—Regions 1, 2, 5, 9, and 10—effective April 1. The restructuring consolidates existing divisions into 15 new units, including a newly established Administration for a Healthy America (AHA).

AHA will integrate several agencies—the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Health Resources and Services Administration, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Its focus will include primary care, maternal and child health, mental health, environmental health, HIV/AIDS, and workforce development.

HHS also plans to establish a new Assistant Secretary for Enforcement to oversee the Departmental Appeals Board, Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals, and Office for Civil Rights—aiming to curb waste, fraud, and abuse in federal health programs. Additionally, the Administration for Community Living will be absorbed into other HHS agencies, including the Administration for Children and Families, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Lawmakers Examine Fair Labor Standards Act in Light of Modern Workforce

On March 25, the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections held a hearing to evaluate the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), focusing on its effectiveness, challenges, and potential updates for today’s workforce.

Enacted in 1938, the FLSA established a federal minimum wage, overtime pay requirements, and child labor protections. With the rise of independent work and changes in technology and workplace practices, both lawmakers and witnesses called for reforms to better reflect the current labor landscape.

Witnesses emphasized the need for clearer definitions of employers, employees, and work to ensure fair pay. They urged updates to how overtime pay is calculated, along with clearer criteria for exempt status and compensable time.

Additional recommendations included strengthening the U.S. Department of Labor’s enforcement authority and enabling flexible schedules, learning opportunities, and nontraditional work arrangements to meet the evolving needs of workers and employers alike.

Congress Explores AI’s Role in K-12 Education

The Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education held a hearing to examine the evolving role of technology in schools, with a focus on the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom.

Lawmakers and witnesses discussed how schools can equip students to use AI responsibly while maximizing its benefits. A key theme was the need for standardized data protections that uphold student privacy.

Witnesses called for a strong federal framework to support cybersecurity infrastructure and interoperability standards. They also emphasized the importance of continued research to assess AI-related risks and of increased funding to close the digital divide and ensure equitable access to technology.

The hearing highlighted how AI can empower educators to personalize instruction, support students with disabilities, and better prepare students for a rapidly changing workforce. Witnesses noted that early exposure to AI tools could give students a long-term advantage in navigating emerging career paths.

Federal Student Aid Reopens IDR and Loan Consolidation Applications

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Federal Student Aid has reopened applications for income-driven repayment (IDR) plans and loan consolidation, following updates to comply with a federal court order.

The revisions stem from a Feb. 18 injunction issued by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, which temporarily blocks the Department from implementing the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan and certain provisions of other IDR plans. The injunction prohibits the use of the SAVE formula to calculate monthly payments and halts loan forgiveness under the SAVE, Pay As You Earn (PAYE), and Income-Contingent Repayment (ICR) plans.

Despite these restrictions, borrowers can still apply for the Income-Based Repayment (IBR), PAYE, and ICR plans using the updated application. 

Updates from the Judiciary 

Supreme Court Hears Arguments Surrounding Tax Exemption for Religious Organizations 

Catholic Charities Bureau Inc. is challenging a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that denied the organization a religious exemption from state unemployment insurance taxes. The nonprofit argues that the state unconstitutionally rejected its exemption request, which Wisconsin law allows for organizations operated primarily for religious purposes.

Wisconsin contends that, while the organization may be religiously motivated, its services – such as job training for people with disabilities – are secular in nature and therefore do not qualify for the exemption.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the state, ruling that Catholic Charities is not operated primarily for religious purposes. The organization appealed, and the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 31.

Justices appeared likely to rule in Catholic Charities’ favor but expressed concern about the broader implications of expanding religious exemptions. Wisconsin’s Assistant Attorney General warned that such a ruling could jeopardize unemployment coverage for more than one million employees nationwide, including those working in religiously affiliated hospitals.

A decision from The Supreme Court is expected by the end of June.

Federal Court Blocks Enforcement of EDI Certification Requirement for DOL Grantees

A federal judge in the Northern District of Illinois has temporarily blocked the Department of Labor from enforcing part of an executive order that requires grantees to certify they do not operate equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) programs that violate federal anti-discrimination laws.

The judge ruled that the certification requirement likely violates free speech rights. The decision noted that the executive order’s vague language and lack of clear definitions of “illegal” EDI programs could lead to self-censorship by grantees seeking to avoid financial penalties.

The order extends to all Labor Department contractors and grant recipients and remains in place until April 10 while the court considers a permanent injunction.  

Federal Court Blocks Termination of Refugee Resettlement Contracts

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington has issued an injunction halting the cancellation of contracts under the U.S. Refugee Admission Program (USRAP). The ruling follows an earlier nationwide injunction against an executive order that temporarily suspended refugee admissions.

In response to that first injunction, Secretary of State Marco Rubio moved to terminate all domestic resettlement agency cooperative agreements for reception and placement services, as well as all but one agreement supporting USRAP processing abroad.

Judge Whitehead ruled that the termination of these agreements would “effectively dismantle” USRAP and violate the earlier court order. The new injunction aims to preserve the status quo and prevent irreversible harm to refugee resettlement infrastructure as litigation proceeds.

Subscribe to the Policy and Advocacy Radar to receive our biweekly policy roundup, which includes commentary on issues in Social Current’s federal policy agenda, opportunities to take action, and curated news and opportunities.

Our technology infrastructure is a critical component to the services we deliver to our network. After careful evaluation, it was decided that a complete overhaul was needed to ensure the stability and evolution of our systems moving forward and provide an overall enhanced user experience.

Social Current is pleased to announce the completion of its technology redevelopment project. This was a major undertaking and requiring significant financial investment, with the project spanning 14 months of planning and development to evaluate all business processes and rebuild everything from the ground up – from intake to invoicing to site visits to accreditation – and everything in between. As is often the case with these types of initiatives, a significant amount of work took place on the back end and while not directly visible, is foundational to the changes you will notice.

Your ongoing feedback has been critical to the success of this project, and we have listened to the pain points to streamline processes and increase usability. A few key enhancements include streamlining the entire accreditation process, discontinuing the use of Box for materials submission allowing for direct uploads of materials, updating schedulers to enhance the intake process for organizations beginning the accreditation process, and creating an integrated and seamless experience across all Social Current portals and for event registration.

Our work does not stop here, and we continue to invest in and improve our systems to ensure an optimal user experience. We will continue to solicit user feedback as you begin to utilize the new portals.

Questions?
Organizations that are in-process for COA Accreditation should view the FAQ section in the MyCOA portal or contact their accreditation coordinator. All other organizations should email our helpdesk.

If you have questions regarding the new MyCOA portal, please visit the FAQs Guide.

On March 20, President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the Secretary of Education to take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education. The order intends to return authority over education to the states and their local communities. 

The Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, issued a statement stating that “closing the Department does not mean cutting off funds from those who depend on them.” McMahon affirmed the Department’s commitment to supporting K-12 students, students with special needs, college student borrowers, and others who rely on essential programs.  

Although terminating the Department of Education requires Congress to pass directed legislation, the order follows significant staffing reductions that will hinder the Department of Education’s ability to function effectively.  

CMS Rescinds Medicaid’s Health-Related Social Needs Guidance 

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid issued an informational bulletin announcing its recission of 2023 and 2024 guidance explaining how states could access Medicaid coverage for health-related social needs (HRSNs), including through Section 1115 demonstrations. The demonstrations fund opportunities for states to create trial projects to assist Medicaid beneficiaries in accessing essential health care services. The guidance also rescinds the HRSN framework published by CMS in 2023. 

The demonstrations enabled states to provide support through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program, including toward: 

The policy change does not apply to existing HRSN programs that Medicaid covers; however, it may impact states’ ability to renew their coverage policies. CMS will continue to consider state requests for Medicaid coverage of HRSNs on a case-by-case basis to determine whether they comply with other federal requirements.   

President Trump Signs Continuing Resolution 

Congress approved a continuing resolution (CR) that will extend government funding through September. The CR increases funding for the Food and Drug Administration, including by allocating an additional $500 million for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. It also extends funding for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Community Health Centers, the National Health Service Corps, and the Special Diabetes Program. 

The resolution also calls for funding cuts, including:  

CMS Offers Flexibility for State Medicaid and CHIP FFS Program Deadlines 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services offered additional time for states struggling to implement a rule that would require fee-for-service Medicaid programs to improve the timeliness of prior authorization decisions (CMS-0057-F). 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Interoperability and Prior Authorization final rule established that, beginning January 1, 2026, state Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program fee-for-service programs send prior authorization decisions within established timeframes: 72 hours for expedited requests and seven calendar days for standard requests. When prior authorizations are denied, the reason for the denial must be communicated to providers. 

However, CMS recognizes the unique challenges and extenuating circumstances states may face as they implement the adjusted timeframes. The agency expressed its commitment to working with state Medicaid and CHIP FFS programs to discuss situational challenges and identify a target compliance date.  

Senate Committee on Aging Holds a Hearing on Senior Loneliness 

The United States Senate Special Committee on Aging held a hearing to discuss the epidemic of rising social isolation and loneliness among American seniors and the severe harm it poses to their health and safety. Witnesses and senators lamented the increased risk to seniors’ physical and mental health, memory and thinking skills, and potential to participate in the workforce.  

Committee members and witnesses discussed risk factors, including the decline of multi-generational living, declining participation in community and civic life, and barriers to physical and financial mobility. Witnesses recommended strengthening federal programs and aging services, investing in meal programs, and expanding intergenerational programs. They also advocated for enhancing Medicare’s role in addressing loneliness including through wellness visits with routine screenings, supporting caregivers, improving transportation access, and strengthening digital inclusion. 

House Committee on Education and Workforce Holds a Hearing on School Choice  

The Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education detailed declining education outcomes and stressed the trend’s harm to children’s futures and America’s prosperity and security. Chairman Kiley (R-CA) introduced school choice as a critical place for reform, including through conventional vouchers, education savings account vouchers, tax credit scholarship vouchers, and tax credits.  

Ranking Member Bonamici (D-Ore.) affirmed the importance of school choice through magnet schools, public charter schools, and inter-district and intra-district open enrollment policies. However, Bonamici also emphasized the importance of public schools’ federal civil right protections against discrimination and segregation and stressed the lack of accountability in private schools. 

Several witnesses spoke in favor of private schools and the safety and academic quality they offer. Dr. Michael McShane, the director of national research at EdChoice, a nonprofit whose mission is to advance educational freedom and choice as a pathway to successful lives and a stronger society, cited studies that demonstrated how school choice programs generally help raise participants’ academic results. In seventeen random assignment studies, eleven found positive results for some or all students, four found no effect, and two found negative effects.  

Nevertheless, Jessica Levin, the litigation director for the Education Law Center, a nonprofit that strives to safeguard students’ right to a high-quality education, spoke against private schools and raised concerns about their limited quality and accountability standards. Levin refuted the evidence provided by the previous witnesses presented and shared studies of worsening academic outcomes in private schools. She also stressed uncovered expenses, including transportation and books, the loss of federal protections public schools offer to students with disabilities, and the harm of diverting federal and state funds from underfunded public schools. 

Head Start Grantees Instructed to Remove EDI from Training and Expenditures

On March 21, the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) announced that the Office of Head Start will not approve the use of federal funding for training, technical assistance, or other program expenditures that promote or participate in equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) initiatives. This decision also applies to expenditures for services provided by contractors or vendors.

Acting Assistant Secretary Andrew Gradison further advised Head Start grant recipients to carefully review their funding applications, including the budget and budget justification narrative, training and technical assistance plans, program goals, and any other supplemental materials, before submitting their next application.

This announcement aligns with an executive order issued by President Trump, which directs federal agencies and departments to eliminate EDI initiatives.

Updates from the Judiciary 

Executive Orders Prohibiting Federal EDI Efforts Temporarily Reinstated 

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is allowing the Trump administration to temporarily reinstate two executive orders that prohibited equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) efforts at federal agencies and government contractors as litigation continues.  

Ending Radical and Wasteful Government EDI Programs and Preferencing directs federal agencies to abolish all EDI programs within the federal government. Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity requires recipients of federal grants and contracts to certify that they do not operate unlawful EDI programs, and it directs federal officials to “encourage” the private sector to end EDI. 

Judges within the 4th Circuit maintained that the partial, nationwide preliminary injunction previously issued was premature but noted the administration might violate free speech and other rights if the orders are enforced too aggressively. The verdict does not determine the legality of the executive orders, and the lawsuit remains pending.  

Supreme Court Agrees to Determine the Constitutionality of Conversion Therapy Ban 

The Supreme Court agreed to hear a lawsuit questioning the constitutionality of Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy for minors. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry defines conversion therapies, or reparative therapies, as interventions that alter same-sex attractions or an individual’s gender expression to align with heterosexuality. 

The lawsuit was filed by Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor and a practicing Christian, who maintained Colorado’s law violates her First Amendment rights to free speech and to freely exercise her religion.  

The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld Colorado’s law because it was enacted based on the evidence of conversion therapy’s harm. Rather than speech, the court determined the law sought to regulate the health care profession and therapists’ conduct.  

The Supreme Court’s hearings will likely be held in the fall, and its decision will likely be issued in the summer of 2026. The verdict will decide whether state and local governments can enforce laws banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ children. 

Through COA Accreditation, a service of Social Current, we seek to empower organizations to implement best practice standards to improve service delivery and achieve better outcomes for individuals and communities. COA Accreditation provides a framework to help organizations manage resources, incorporate best practices, and strive for continuous improvement.

We believe there is rich expertise in our field, so we ground the COA Accreditation process in our human and social services community. Our volunteer peer reviewers conduct our site visits and finalize accreditation decisions.

We are proud to spotlight the latest Volunteer of the Quarter: Milton Fonseca.

About Milton Fonseca

Milton Fonseca’s family emigrated from Cuba and settled in South Florida in 1991. Raised by a hardworking single mother, he learned the values of perseverance, integrity, and dedication to service. His professional journey began in 2004 when he joined the Advocate Program Inc. (AP) as a front desk clerk in the DUI Department. AP is a multifaceted organization serving the South Florida tri-county area of Miami-Dade, Broward, and Monroe Counties, and as of 2024, has expanded its services to Volusia County in Northeast Florida.

Throughout his tenure at AP, Fonseca has advanced within the organization from a program specialist to a program manager, and in 2018, assuming the role of director of performance and quality improvement. In 2024, he was appointed director of operations for Volusia County. His educational journey has been equally fulfilling—he earned his associate’s in business administration from Miami-Dade College in the summer of 2023 and completed a bachelor’s in leadership and innovation with a concentration in human resources in December 2024. He is also actively affiliated with Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the Florida Association of Community Corrections, both of which align with his commitment to public safety and rehabilitation efforts.

Fonseca was first introduced to COA Accreditation in 2015 when AP made the significant decision to pursue accreditation, reinforcing its dedication to quality service and continuous improvement. In 2019, he became the organization’s primary point of contact for reaccreditation cycles, leading successful reaccreditation efforts in 2019 and 2023. This experience has deepened his appreciation for COA Accreditation as a means of ensuring the highest standards in service delivery and organizational excellence.

Q&A

What three traits define you?

The three traits that define me are perseverance, resilience, and empathy. Throughout my professional journey and personal growth, I have had the privilege of working alongside passionate individuals dedicated to making a meaningful impact in the communities they serve. I firmly believe that success is built on a foundation of hard work, determination, and an unwavering commitment to progress, even in the face of adversity.

Resilience has allowed me to navigate challenges with strength and adaptability, turning obstacles into opportunities for growth. However, true leadership and service require empathy. Understanding and valuing the experiences of others fosters meaningful connections, ethical decision-making, and a genuine commitment to improving lives.

What are your strongest beliefs about the value of COA Accreditation?

I firmly believe that COA Accreditation is a powerful testament to an organization’s commitment to excellence. It signifies that an organization has met the highest standards of service, ensuring that every aspect of its operations–from service delivery to internal processes–aligns with best practices and industry benchmarks.

COA Accreditation is more than just a credential; it represents ongoing dedication to quality, accountability, and continuous improvement. It strengthens an organization’s ability to fulfill its mission, enhances service outcomes, and builds trust among clients, stakeholders, and the community. It is a symbol of integrity and a reflection of an unwavering pursuit of excellence in everything an organization does.

What advice would you give someone interested in being a COA Accreditation volunteer?

Go for it! Becoming a COA Accreditation volunteer is an incredibly rewarding experience that will challenge you, help you grow, and shape your professional development in ways you never imagined. As a COA Accreditation Peer Reviewer, you’ll gain invaluable insight into best practices across the nation, learning from diverse organizations that are making a real difference in their communities. Not only will you bring back knowledge and fresh perspectives to your own organization, but you will also contribute to strengthening the field as a whole.

Along the way, you’ll meet dedicated professionals who share your passion for service—and maybe even a celebrity or two! During one site visit, I had the unexpected honor of meeting Academy-Award-winning actress Jamie Lee Curtis—but I digress. More importantly, serving as a Peer Reviewer has been one of the greatest joys of my career. I look forward to continuing this journey for many years as a Lead Peer Reviewer and being part of Social Current’s mission to promote excellence in human and social services through COA Accreditation.

What excites, surprises, and/or challenges you the most about the work you do as a COA Accreditation volunteer?

When I began my journey as a COA Accreditation Peer Reviewer, I was eager to witness the incredible work being done by organizations across the country, hoping to bring back valuable insights and best practices to enhance my own organization. What I didn’t expect was the profound impact that my fellow Peer Reviewers —particularly the seasoned Lead Reviewers—would have on me, both professionally and personally.

I have been truly inspired by individuals who have dedicated years, and in some cases, decades, to this work. Their unwavering commitment, professionalism, and passion for service excellence have shaped my own approach as a Peer Reviewer and Lead. I have had the privilege of learning from some of the best, including Helene Cohen, the great Stan Capela, Kathy Cook, Ray Barber, and Jerry Moran. Their mentorship and leadership have not only refined my skills but have deepened my appreciation for the power of COA Accreditation in strengthening organizations and, ultimately, the communities we serve.

What led you to become a COA Accreditation volunteer?

Being deeply involved in my organization’s initial accreditation process and leading subsequent reaccreditation cycles sparked my passion for the COA accreditation process. I was eager to gain a broader perspective—one that allowed me to step into the role of a peer reviewer and witness firsthand how other organizations across the nation operate and serve their communities.

What truly drew me to become a COA Accreditation peer reviewer was the opportunity to witness the incredible work being done by organizations committed to excellence and positive change. Engaging with diverse organizations, learning from their best practices, and contributing to their journey toward continuous improvement is a privilege I do not take for granted. It is both inspiring and rewarding to be part of a process that upholds the highest standards of service and strengthens the collective impact we strive to make in the lives of those we serve.

Learn more about how to become a peer review volunteer and apply online.

Social Current has partnered with the Center for Creative Leadership (CCL) to offer new trainings on a variety of leadership development topics.

The on-demand trainings will address:

CCL is a premier leadership development organization that creates courses for leaders at all levels, as well as assessments and leadership development tools.

CCL helps to expand human potential by developing the mindsets, capacity, and capabilities needed to excel in an ever-changing world. With an emphasis on the power of people, backed by research, and fueled by a focus on innovation, CCL is trusted globally to deliver transformational leadership solutions that cultivate positive change.

Social Current has chosen to partner with CCL because of its:

“Social Current is excited to partner with the Center for Creative Leadership to bring high-quality leadership training opportunities to our network and the sector,” says Robena Spangler, senior director of leadership development and organizational development. “Our organizations are aligned in our mission and vision to address pressing organizational challenges in support of innovative solutions for public and private sector leaders.”

Over its 50-year history, CCL has more than 1 million alumni from 160 countries and has worked with two-thirds of Fortune 1,000 companies.

Learn more about CCL and Social Current’s Leadership and Organizational Development Impact Area.

The Department of Health and Human Services will no longer use notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures for matters relating to agency management or personnel or to public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts. The change in agency practice is expected to grant Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. more discretion and reduce administrative hurdles while setting department policy.

Agencies typically publish proposed rules or notices in the Federal Register, open a time-limited comment period, and review and assess those comments before publishing a final version. The rule change empowers HHS agencies and offices with the discretion to apply notice and comment procedures to these matters but does not require them to do so unless otherwise required by law.

OCR Rescinds Prior Administration Guidance on Civil Rights and Health Information Privacy for Transgender Youth 

The Acting Director of HHS’ Office for Civil Rights rescinded the HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy. The guidance was issued in 2022 and outlined the application of federal civil rights and patient privacy laws to support transgender medical interventions. OCR Acting Director Anthony Archeval stated that the 2022 OCR Notice and Guidance no longer represents the views or policies of HHS OCR. 

The rescission was made to align with Executive Order 14187, “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.” Acting Director Archeval stressed that HHS will not promote, assist, or support “the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another, and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.” The rescission also aligns with Administration policy in Executive Order 14168, “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” 

Secretary of Agriculture Publishes Vision for the Department’s 16 Nutrition Programs 

Secretary Rollins released her guiding principles, encouraging states to partner as innovative collaborators. She stressed the importance of minimizing fraud, waste, and abuse, establishing clear expectations that SNAP recipients capable of working, do, and promoting healthy choices and outcomes.  

The Secretary affirmed her commitment to offering technical assistance and ongoing dialogue to state, tribal, territory, and local government partners. She pledged to work collaboratively to find bold and sustainable solutions that deliver effective programs to families. 

U.S. Senate Committee on Aging Hosts a Hearing to Discuss the Opioid Epidemic 

Chairman Scott (R-Fla.) and Ranking Member Gillibrand (D-NY) stressed the importance of urgent action to address the opioid crisis and increase access to preventative measures. The senators highlighted proposed legislation, including the Overcoming Prevalent Inadequacies in Overdose Information Data Sets Act and Supporting Families through Addiction Act of 2023. They also expressed gratitude for community-wide efforts led by law enforcement, community leaders, and governors.  

Alongside representatives, witnesses spoke to the need for a holistic approach that includes prevention, treatment, and support for grandfamilies. They highlighted the importance of Medicaid and Medicare, interdisciplinary care teams with addiction specialist physicians, and non-opioid options for chronic pain relief. Additionally, witnesses advocated for robust data collection and stressed the importance of financial stability, especially as many older adults live on fixed incomes.  

A Hearing with Sanctuary City Mayors 

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee held a hearing with the mayors of Boston, Chicago, Denver, and New York City. The hearing follows an investigation created by Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) to examine the policies of sanctuary jurisdictions and their impact on public safety and federal immigration enforcement. 

While sanctuary cities do not have a single definition, they typically refer to a broad range of policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement actions. The mayors stressed that their city policies build trust between residents and police, in turn promoting safety and reducing crime. They highlighted the importance of investing in housing, nutrition, and healthcare and utilizing public safety resources wisely. The mayors additionally illustrated the legacy immigration has offered their cities and encouraged Congress to open additional pathways to immigration. However, several representatives expressed concern for public safety and maintained that the cities’ policies violate federal law by failing to cooperate with federal agents. 

Federal Budgetary Updates 

The Senate and House approved the Fiscal Year 2025 budget resolution along party lines. The Senate voted in favor 52 to 48 and the House, 217 to 216. The funding prioritizes border security, the military, and energy independence, but it does not address the expiring provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). 

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act temporarily expanded the child tax credit, increased the adjusted gross income limit for cash donations made to public charities from 50% to 60%, and offered an employer credit for paid family and medical leave. Several critical provisions are set to expire on Dec. 31, which would jeopardize key funding streams, workforce stability, and service delivery for nonprofits. 

However, renewing the credits would require significant funding. Without the TCJA provisions, the House Budget is expected to increase the deficit by $4.8 trillion. Congress is expected to offset the costs through reductions to Medicaid and social services, including TANF, SNAP, and WIC. 

As the House and Senate work to find agreement on a proposed budget, they are expected to pass an additional continuing resolution as the current resolution will expire federal funding on March 14.  

President Trump Issues an Executive Order Surrounding Public Service Loan Forgiveness

On March 7, President Trump issued an executive order to prevent individuals employed by organizations with a substantial illegal purpose from becoming eligible for public service loan forgiveness. The order, Restoring Public Service Loan Forgiveness, tasks the secretaries of the Education Department and Treasury Department with ensuring that the definition of public service excludes organizations that support terrorism, violate immigration laws, and commit child abuse, including through providing gender-affirming care.

Sector Updates from the Judiciary  

Ongoing Legal Challenges to the Trump Administration’s Executive Orders  

Several executive orders issued by the Trump Administration have been granted preliminary injunctions. Previously, executive orders limiting access to gender-affirming care, pausing federal funding for nongovernmental organizations, and stopping the recognition of birthright citizenship were granted temporary restraining orders. Temporary restraining orders last up to fourteen days and are intended to provide short-term relief to prevent permanent injury, loss, or damage. Preliminary injunctions may remain in place for months or years while a lawsuit is pending. Most recently, preliminary injunctions were issued against executive orders freezing funding for refugee resettlement programs and federal financial assistance, allowing immigration raids in places of worship, stopping the recognition of birthright citizenship, and limiting access to gender-affirming care. 

By granting preliminary injunctions, executive orders will not go into effect until a judge issues their ruling. However, preliminary injunctions can be appealed. 

Trump Administration Prepares to Withdraw Emergency Abortion Lawsuit 

The US, Idaho, and the state lawmakers agreed to dismiss a lawsuit over whether Idaho can prohibit health-care providers from performing abortions when necessary to treat an emergency medical condition. 

The former secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services sued Idaho in 2022 because of a provision that may have been interpreted as designating emergency abortion care illegal. Then-Secretary Xavier Becerra sued the state, arguing that the abortion law’s provision irreconcilably conflicted with hospitals’ obligations under the federal emergency care statute. 

The lawsuit raised the question of whether states are allowed to prosecute doctors for performing abortions to stabilize emergency medical conditions, despite the Federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act’s directive that Medicare hospitals provide emergency services regardless of patients’ ability to pay. 

The Trump administration’s decision to withdraw the lawsuit will allow emergency abortions to remain legal, although it does mark a departure from the Biden administration’s efforts to clarify that federal directives on emergency health care take precedence over state abortion bans. 

Subscribe to the Policy and Advocacy Radar to receive our biweekly policy roundup, which includes commentary on issues in Social Current’s federal policy agenda, opportunities to take action, and curated news and opportunities.

Human services professionals are on the frontlines working to support individuals and families across the lifespan with nuance and empathy. That sensitivity and care is critical because the stakes for communities are high—which may also be why some are surprised to hear that artificial intelligence (AI) is being adopted in the human services sector.  

Dr. Lauri Goldkind, professor at Fordham University and guest speaker at Social Current’s 2025 CEO Convening, is a social work expert and researcher who has extensively explored AI’s potential to impact human services. Her 2021 article, Social Work and Artificial Intelligence: Into the Matrix, reveals critical considerations for the future of the sector. Learn more from our summary below and access the full text of the article through the Fordham Research Commons.  

What Place Does AI Have in Human Services? 

The term AI is vague on its own—it’s used to describe several different tools, intended for specific uses, like facial recognition, data analysis, or speech comprehension. Today’s AI tools are not advanced enough to fully replace the work of individual people, rather, AI is a tool that works best when used to enhance—not replace—human expertise. 

The implications are huge. This means that professionals and organizations can effect change on a scale not previously possible. As Goldkind articulates in her article, it’s already transformed human services work significantly: 

  1. For Individuals: AI-powered virtual counselors can give mental health support to people who can’t access human therapists. These virtual counselors use facial expressions, body language, and speech to act like humans. Early results show they can help people stay on track with their treatment. 
  2. For Organizations: AI can help social service agencies work smarter. For example, predictive analytics can look at data to figure out which clients need the most help. One food pantry used AI to predict who was at risk of food insecurity, so they could step in before things got worse. 
  3. For Systemic Problems: AI can tackle large-scale issues through data collaboratives—where organizations share data to solve problems. For example, the Chicago Data Collaborative combines data from police, courts, and jails to give a clearer picture of the criminal justice system. This info helps journalists, researchers, and activists push for change.  

AI offers a lot of opportunities for the work, but is it too good to be true? 

Preventing Potential Harm 

While AI has a lot of potential, it also comes with risks. As Goldkind notes, one of the top threats in human services work is individual bias. Even under the best circumstances, professionals may have unconscious biases that affect how they interpret information or make decisions. While AI itself doesn’t have biases, people who create it and the data it uses still reflect real-world inequalities. This naturally raises ethical concerns, especially when AI is used in areas like criminal justice or child welfare.  

For this reason, Goldkind believes the best outcomes for AI in these applications start before they are built: “As a values-centered profession with a robust code of ethics, social work is uniquely positioned to engage across disciplines to inform the creation of thoughtful algorithmically enhanced policy and practice at all levels.” Collaboration between tech and human services then becomes a critical symbiosis—providing long-term support to workers and protecting the needs of vulnerable communities. 

Read the full-text article online. 

CEOs: Learn More From Dr. Goldkind 

At this point AI’s place in the industry is cemented, it has filled significant gaps in the system and provides speedy results to cumbersome work—there is no going back. Yet we are only at the beginning of AI’s widespread implementation.  

Familiarity with AI is necessary to remain competitive and relevant in today’s work, and future leaders will be expected to understand it well. That’s why we’re excited to have Dr. Goldkind as a guest speaker at Social Current’s 2025 Convening for Chief Executives, where human services CEOs will learn from peers and other experts about the latest innovations in the field. Register now to join us March 19-20 in Charlotte, North Carolina. 

Executives and Senior-Level Managers: Learn More at the Executive Leadership Institute 

Social Current’s 2025 Executive Leadership Institute, held in partnership with Loyola University Chicago’s Quinlan School of Business, provides foundational leadership training and addresses hot topics, including AI in human services. 

Learn more about this year’s program, which includes a weeklong event June 8-12 in Chicago, as well as a year of virtual learning, mentoring, and support with self-designed projects that address organizational challenges.